X (Formerly Twitter) Expresses 'Discomfort' with Karnataka Court Order, Champions Freedom of Expression?
I was truly surprised when I heard this news! 😮 Elon Musk's X has expressed strong concerns regarding a recent order from the Karnataka High Court in India. The issue lies in the police being able to issue arbitrary content removal orders through the 'Sahyog' portal. Will X be able to protect freedom of expression in India? Let's delve into the details!

Hello everyone! Today, I've brought a truly fascinating piece of news. It's a story involving X (formerly Twitter), led by Elon Musk, and the Karnataka High Court in India. I was really intrigued when I saw these reports. 🤔
X 'Objects' to Karnataka Court Order 🚨
Recently, the Karnataka High Court in India issued a rather unusual order to X. It granted police officers the authority to issue arbitrary content removal orders through a portal called 'Sahyog'. In response, X immediately expressed strong concerns and has opposed this move.
In a statement, X pointed out, "This new regulation lacks legal basis, circumvents Section 69A of the IT Act, and violates Supreme Court rulings." It further clarified, "This infringes upon the constitutionally guaranteed freedom of expression and rights of Indian citizens."
Content Removal Without 'Judicial Review' Raises 'Illegality' Concerns ⚖️
X's biggest concern lies precisely here. Under this new system, content on the platform can be completely removed solely on the claim of being 'illegal', without any separate judicial review or due process. It's a frightening thought, isn't it? 😱
X added, "Such a method can severely undermine the platform's transparency and credibility." Content removal is clearly a matter that requires careful and fair procedures. If it's done arbitrarily, it's difficult to predict the problems that might arise.
Found this article helpful?
Never miss insights like this - delivered every morning
Similar Precedent from Bombay High Court Also Mentioned 💡
Interestingly, X also referenced a recent ruling by the Bombay High Court concerning a similar issue. X emphasized, "The Bombay High Court has previously ruled such similar systems to be unconstitutional," arguing that the Karnataka court's current decision is also problematic.
This is interpreted as X not merely addressing this specific incident but also demonstrating a proactive stance to protect 'freedom of expression' across its platform.
What Will Happen to Freedom of Expression in India? 🇮🇳
X's move is expected to further heat up discussions on freedom of expression and online content regulation within India. Will X be able to assert its arguments through legal battles and protect the freedom of expression of Indian citizens?
What are your thoughts? To what extent should freedom of expression be guaranteed online? Please share your valuable opinions in the comments. 🙏
It seems that many discussions always arise at the intersection of technology, law, and individual rights. It will be necessary to closely monitor the future movements between X and the Indian government.